Adobe Should Open Source Freehand

Adobe abandons Freehand. Lest we forget Macromedia abandon Freehand when they released Fireworks. The last really good version was 9 (MS Word 6 good!). To me Freehand always felt more approachable, ‘alive’, Mac-like than the more stoic, snooty, Illustrator. As Adobe attention has shifted to selling to the Windows market - their Mac-ness has dramatically faded and are second only to Microsoft in annoying me every time I use their software.

Head over to the Wikipedia page for Freehand and dig this back-to-the-future moment:

“When Aldus merged with Adobe Systems, because of the overlapping of market with Illustrator, Adobe returned FreeHand to Altsys soon after the merger. Altsys was later bought by Macromedia…”

Adobe is now a full-on official monopoly in the creative tools space. With the only alternative being open-source projects like Inkscape and Xara.

Why did Google buy Writely and why did Sun buy StarOffice?

It’s was cheaper than paying someone else for licenses and support on tools needed to run their businesses.

All of this reinforcing the need for creative professionals to dedicate their time and talent to free, open-source project. See Darrel’s list of Open Source for Designers. We get more control, tools that work the way they want them too, and save thousands of dollars in licensing a year.

Personally, I think Adobe should open source the tools they no longer want to support…like my beloved Freehand. That would have the added benefit of making me not think Adobe is evil.