<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Should Open Source Freehand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand</link>
	<description>Minnesota's Interaction Design, Information Architecture, and User Experience Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:19:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/comment-page-1#comment-63382</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/#comment-63382</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that no up-and-coming software designer has decided to recreate Freehand somehow. I&#039;d buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that no up-and-coming software designer has decided to recreate Freehand somehow. I&#8217;d buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Recently Divorced Freehand users searching for romance with another Vector application&#8230; &#187; MNteractive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/comment-page-1#comment-10238</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Recently Divorced Freehand users searching for romance with another Vector application&#8230; &#187; MNteractive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/#comment-10238</guid>
		<description>[...] that Freehand is officially dead I figure it&#8217;s time I start playing the field again and look for a new love. Here&#8217;s the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Freehand is officially dead I figure it&#8217;s time I start playing the field again and look for a new love. Here&#8217;s the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dowdell</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/comment-page-1#comment-9056</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dowdell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 04:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/#comment-9056</guid>
		<description>I have no info on this yet, but I&#039;ll be sure to pass this link among people I work with at Adobe. 

I was talking with some of the ex-Altsys staff in Adobe&#039;s San Francisco office today, and the recurring theme was that it&#039;s a very old codebase which would be difficult to really use today, but I&#039;ll make sure your words here are heard.

jd/adobe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no info on this yet, but I&#8217;ll be sure to pass this link among people I work with at Adobe. </p>
<p>I was talking with some of the ex-Altsys staff in Adobe&#8217;s San Francisco office today, and the recurring theme was that it&#8217;s a very old codebase which would be difficult to really use today, but I&#8217;ll make sure your words here are heard.</p>
<p>jd/adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/comment-page-1#comment-9029</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/adobe-should-open-source-freehand/#comment-9029</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s two problems with this:

a) Adobe is just like MS. They fear open source and have absolutely no interest in aiding the enemy. They&#039;d rather bury Freehand in the back 40 than ever have it see the light of day again.

b) I have a strong hunch that the codebase of Freehand is antiquated and held to gether with duct tape and bailing twine. It&#039;s been on live support since version 9 and never really recovered after Version 7 in terms of being a stable product.

I love Freehand. Will continue to use it until it no longer installs on my machine. That said, we all saw this coming for years. 

Here&#039;s to hoping that inkscape picks up some momentum! ;o)

Meanwhile, we&#039;ll just watch both MS and Adobe battle it out with their competing Flash/Longsilver and PDF/whateverMScallsTheirPDF for the next few years while other products just rot away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s two problems with this:</p>
<p>a) Adobe is just like MS. They fear open source and have absolutely no interest in aiding the enemy. They&#8217;d rather bury Freehand in the back 40 than ever have it see the light of day again.</p>
<p>b) I have a strong hunch that the codebase of Freehand is antiquated and held to gether with duct tape and bailing twine. It&#8217;s been on live support since version 9 and never really recovered after Version 7 in terms of being a stable product.</p>
<p>I love Freehand. Will continue to use it until it no longer installs on my machine. That said, we all saw this coming for years. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to hoping that inkscape picks up some momentum! ;o)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, we&#8217;ll just watch both MS and Adobe battle it out with their competing Flash/Longsilver and PDF/whateverMScallsTheirPDF for the next few years while other products just rot away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
