<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: April UX Meetup recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/</link>
	<description>minnesota's interaction design community</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristi Olson-Dowling</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-38247</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristi Olson-Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-38247</guid>
		<description>You are spot on with what I'm talking about.  I think quant has a place, distinct from and/or complementary to qual -- e.g. benchmarking, creating goal-setting measures, hypoethsis-creation (to be later followed up by qual), etc.  It's a CHEAP way of getting a stastical sampling of users with some light qual (i.e. using open-ended fields).  

And, like Ethnio, you can do intercepts of REAL shoppers in REAL contexts (as opposed to pre-recruits).  I'm tending to prioritize realness over non-realness in terms of which methods in my kit of tools I prefer.  Usability testing can be frustratingly unrealistic.

What are the inexpensive quant/qual tools you've seen out there?  I've been demo-ing UserZoom, RelevantVue and am soon to test Keynote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are spot on with what I&#8217;m talking about.  I think quant has a place, distinct from and/or complementary to qual &#8212; e.g. benchmarking, creating goal-setting measures, hypoethsis-creation (to be later followed up by qual), etc.  It&#8217;s a CHEAP way of getting a stastical sampling of users with some light qual (i.e. using open-ended fields).  </p>
<p>And, like Ethnio, you can do intercepts of REAL shoppers in REAL contexts (as opposed to pre-recruits).  I&#8217;m tending to prioritize realness over non-realness in terms of which methods in my kit of tools I prefer.  Usability testing can be frustratingly unrealistic.</p>
<p>What are the inexpensive quant/qual tools you&#8217;ve seen out there?  I&#8217;ve been demo-ing UserZoom, RelevantVue and am soon to test Keynote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin farner</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-37855</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin farner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-37855</guid>
		<description>Kristi, on the quant/qual. There is a place for both in terms of usability, but unmoderated question doesn't get you to the 'why' as easily as a moderated "please think out loud" usability study.  The unmoderated obviously gives you volume, and there are some great tools on the web that give you volume on the cheap.  AND you can see failure such as '90% of people didn't click on the button to accomplish the task'.  But, again, if that is all you do, you miss out on why the users didn't click on the button, what were they trying to do.

And typically these tests are done at the tail-end of a project whereas we'll do moderated usability at the paper prototype stage.

If I have veered wildly off of what you are talking about, let me know :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristi, on the quant/qual. There is a place for both in terms of usability, but unmoderated question doesn&#8217;t get you to the &#8216;why&#8217; as easily as a moderated &#8220;please think out loud&#8221; usability study.  The unmoderated obviously gives you volume, and there are some great tools on the web that give you volume on the cheap.  AND you can see failure such as &#8216;90% of people didn&#8217;t click on the button to accomplish the task&#8217;.  But, again, if that is all you do, you miss out on why the users didn&#8217;t click on the button, what were they trying to do.</p>
<p>And typically these tests are done at the tail-end of a project whereas we&#8217;ll do moderated usability at the paper prototype stage.</p>
<p>If I have veered wildly off of what you are talking about, let me know <img src='http://www.mnteractive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin farner</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-37853</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin farner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-37853</guid>
		<description>Kristi, thanks for setting this up, you too Garrick.  I blogged about the meet-up, I had a great time. 
http://kevinfarner.com/2008/04/02/mnteractive-my-first-meetup/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristi, thanks for setting this up, you too Garrick.  I blogged about the meet-up, I had a great time.<br />
<a href="http://kevinfarner.com/2008/04/02/mnteractive-my-first-meetup/" rel="nofollow">http://kevinfarner.com/2008/04/02/mnteractive-my-first-meetup/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Farner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MNteractive - my first meetup</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-37851</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Farner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MNteractive - my first meetup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/april-ux-meetup-recap/#comment-37851</guid>
		<description>[...] already beat me to the punch with her write-up on the evening but I&#8217;ll write mine up anyway, as a n00b&#8217;s perspective to this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] already beat me to the punch with her write-up on the evening but I&#8217;ll write mine up anyway, as a n00b&#8217;s perspective to this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
