<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Feuding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/blog-feuding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/blog-feuding</link>
	<description>Minnesota's Interaction Design, Information Architecture, and User Experience Design Community</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garrick Van Buren</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/blog-feuding/comment-page-1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/blog-feuding/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://norwegianity.com/index.php?id=1070"&gt;Norwegianity has some comments on boycotting TCF&lt;/a&gt;. Now, last I heard, estabilishments around town weren't accepting checks from TCF checking accounts because the bounce rates were so bad. Makes me think there are plenty of other reasons not to use TCF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://norwegianity.com/index.php?id=1070">Norwegianity has some comments on boycotting TCF</a>. Now, last I heard, estabilishments around town weren&#8217;t accepting checks from TCF checking accounts because the bounce rates were so bad. Makes me think there are plenty of other reasons not to use TCF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
