<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MNteractive.com &#187; Digital Rights Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/category/digital-rights-management/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com</link>
	<description>Minnesota's Interaction Design, Information Architecture, and User Experience Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The irony of DRM suckitude.</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/the-irony-of-drm-suckitude</link>
		<comments>http://mnteractive.com/archive/the-irony-of-drm-suckitude#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrel Austin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worst Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/the-irony-of-drm-suckitude/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently upgraded my Gen 1 to a iPod 160gb Classic. Probably a dumb decision given that I appear to have only about 12 gigs of music. Oh well. I&#8217;m a sucker for big numbers. And while it&#8217;s nice&#8230;it&#8217;s also been a huge pain in the ass. The movieÂ  Babel came through our Netflix queue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently upgraded my Gen 1 to a iPod 160gb Classic. Probably a dumb decision given that I appear to have only about 12 gigs of music. Oh well. I&#8217;m a sucker for big numbers.</p>
<p>And while it&#8217;s nice&#8230;it&#8217;s also been a huge pain in the ass.</p>
<p>The movieÂ  <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0449467/">Babel </a>came through our Netflix queue a few months ago. I thought it was an excellent, wonderfully moody movie. The next evening I had the urge to listen to more of the soundtrack. Well, as usual, eMusic didn&#8217;t have it. I don&#8217;t think Amazon had opened the flood gates yet to their MP3s, and iTunes only had the crappy DRMed version. But I had the itch and iTunes makes it so easy to purchase it, so against my better judgement, I paid for the DRM version.</p>
<p>And that was fine.</p>
<p>Until I wanted to also listen to the songs on my new iPod.</p>
<p>For some reason, every other track or so from this double album won&#8217;t play on my iPod. It just gets &#8216;stuck&#8217;. Crap.</p>
<p>Do a bit of googling, and find an Apple Tech Doc.</p>
<p>Step one: De-authorize and then re-authorize your machine. Ok, that was easy. Nope. Didn&#8217;t fix the problem.</p>
<p>Step two: Reset yourÂ  iPod to it&#8217;s original factory settings. Hmm&#8230;this is a bit of a pain. First, download the 60mb update file. Install it, wipe the iPod clean, then resynch it all. An hour later and&#8230;nope. Didn&#8217;t fix the problem.</p>
<p>Step three: Rebuild your iTunes library. Sigh. That&#8217;ll take an hour. And now I have to re-synch it to my iPod. There goes another half hour. And, yea, you guessed it&#8230;didn&#8217;t fix the problem.</p>
<p>&#8220;In Gen. 11:9, the name of Babel is etymologized by association with the Hebrew verb balal, &#8216;to confuse or confound&#8217;&#8221;. The myth is that Babel was the city that united humanity, with everyone speaking a single language. God didn&#8217;t like this for whatever reason and decided to scatter humanity across the globe and confused their languages so that we&#8217;d forever have difficulties communicating as one.</p>
<p>The movie plays off of this quite poetically, in my opinion. iTunes plays off of this withÂ  stunning irony as well. I have to smile at clever irony. But must really restrain my urge to SMASH COMPUTER SMASH IPOD SMASH DRM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mnteractive.com/archive/the-irony-of-drm-suckitude/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DRM Part III: Windows Vista &#8211; Allow</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/drm-part-iii-windows-vista-allow</link>
		<comments>http://mnteractive.com/archive/drm-part-iii-windows-vista-allow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/drm-part-iii-windows-vista-allow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last DRM conversation was so much fun, I thought I&#8217;d start another one all about Vista. &#8220;Vista continuously spends CPU time monitoring itself, trying to figure out if you&#8217;re doing something that it thinks you shouldn&#8217;t.&#8221; &#8211; Bruce Schneier &#8220;&#8230;the content protection technology just uses more resources while providing no benefits at all to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last DRM conversation was so much fun, I thought I&#8217;d start another one all about Vista. <img src='http://mnteractive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html">&#8220;Vista continuously spends CPU time monitoring itself, trying to figure out if you&#8217;re doing something that it thinks you shouldn&#8217;t.&#8221; &#8211; Bruce Schneier</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.miraesoft.com/karel/2007/01/23/microsoft-on-content-protection-in-vista/">&#8220;&#8230;the content protection technology just uses more resources while providing no benefits at all to the user&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; Karel Donk</a></p></blockquote>
<p>And I thought the <a href="http://images.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac/apple-getamac-security_480x376.mov">Mac vs PC: Security</a> ad was a joke&#8230;.not reality.</p>
<p>Me &#8211; I&#8217;m not planning to upgrade. <a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/">CrossOver</a> is working pretty well for the infrequency that I need something on Windows. </p>
<p>The guys over at <a href="http://joyeur.com/2007/02/12/ps-pipe-grep-episode-10-have-mercy">Joyeur have a pretty good explanation</a> of why this enhanced security &#8211; is in fact a major security risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mnteractive.com/archive/drm-part-iii-windows-vista-allow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://images.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac/apple-getamac-security_480x376.mov" length="3591501" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes Movie Store: Disney vs. Target</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/itunes-disney-vs-target</link>
		<comments>http://mnteractive.com/archive/itunes-disney-vs-target#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/itunes-disney-vs-target/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve spent no more than $47 at the iTunes store &#8211; despite the increased catalog; movies, music videos, etc. The difficulties of sending my &#8220;purchased&#8221; music to my new MacBook Pro confirm I have no intention of sending another 99&#162; supporting FairPlay. So, you can see why I&#8217;m not impressed by the pissing match between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spent no more than $47 at the iTunes store &#8211; despite the increased catalog; movies, music videos, etc. The difficulties of sending my &#8220;purchased&#8221; music to my new MacBook Pro confirm I have no intention of sending another 99&cent; supporting FairPlay.</p>
<p>So, you can see why I&#8217;m not impressed by the <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/technology/16041094.htm">pissing match between Target and Disney</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/technology/16041094.htm">&#8220;Our space, signing, promotional programs and the hundreds of millions of consumers in our stores annually should not be undervalued.&#8221; &#8211; Target President Gregg Steinhafel</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Steinhafel &#8211; I completely agree, Disney is selling movies on iTunes for less than they&#8217;re charging you because &#8211; the digital versions are in-fact less valuable; lower quality, not pre-backed-up, hyper-touchy DRM, can&#8217;t wrap it up and stuff it in a Christmas stocking. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mnteractive.com/archive/itunes-disney-vs-target/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music DRM&#8230;beginning of the end?</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/music-drmbeginning-of-the-end</link>
		<comments>http://mnteractive.com/archive/music-drmbeginning-of-the-end#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrel Austin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/music-drmbeginning-of-the-end/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few articles came out today with interesting takes on digital music DRM. The first is a small blurb about Dave Goldberg, Yahoo&#8217;s Music Chief at the Music 2.0 conference where he brings up eMusic as an example of a DRM free distribution model. I like this because a) It&#8217;s Yahoo, and they have some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few articles came out today with interesting takes on digital music DRM. The first is a <a href="http://news.com.com/2061-10799_3-6042756.html?part=rss&#038;tag=6042756&#038;subj=news">small blurb about Dave Goldberg</a>, Yahoo&#8217;s Music Chief at the <a href="http://dw.com.com/redir?destUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ihollywoodforum.com%2FdigitalmusicFebruary2006.htm&#038;siteId=3&#038;oId=2061-10799_3-6042756&#038;ontId=10784&#038;lop=nl.ex">Music 2.0</a> conference where he brings up <a href="http://www.emusic.com">eMusic</a> as an example of a DRM free distribution model. I like this because a) It&#8217;s Yahoo, and they have some clout and b) it&#8217;s eMusic, which is a GREAT site, with a great model, along with great pricing. Alas, eMusic always seems to be forgotten when conversations of online music distribution is brought up.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://english.people.com.cn/200602/22/eng20060222_244785.html">other article comes from China</a>. Gino Yu, chairman of <a target="_blank" href="http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/data/hk.html">Hong Kong</a> Digital Entertainment Association, talks about how he feels several technologies now feared by media companies should be seen not as enemies to the industry, but potential money making devices. And it&#8217;s nice to see a media giant spokesman take an opposing view to the RIAA:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yu also doubted the feasibility of the catch-and-sue procedure currently used to bust online piracy, given the difficulty of identifying online pirates and the fast growth of technology innovation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Granted, DRM isn&#8217;t dissappearing tomorrow. <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/1billion/">Apple just sold its billionth DRMed song on iTunes</a>. But it&#8217;s nice to finally see some opposing viewpoints coming from high-up media execs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mnteractive.com/archive/music-drmbeginning-of-the-end/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

