<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MNteractive.com &#187; PeopleAggregator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/category/peopleaggregator/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com</link>
	<description>Minnesota's Interaction Design, Information Architecture, and User Experience Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PeopleAggregator &#8211; MySpace For the Other You?</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/peopleaggregator-myspace-for-the-other-you</link>
		<comments>http://mnteractive.com/archive/peopleaggregator-myspace-for-the-other-you#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PeopleAggregator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useless utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/peopleaggregator-myspace-for-the-other-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a preview of the latest thing in &#8216;social network&#8217; sites today, PeopleAggregator (here by &#8216;PA&#8217;). I&#8217;m not impressed. Though, as Steve Borsch points out &#8211; it is awe-inspiring. Everything and the kitchen sink is in there &#8211; blogs, people, groups, audio, video, photos, links, search engines, everything! Like MySpace, and Friendster before it, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a preview of the latest thing in &#8216;social network&#8217; sites today,  <a href="http://peopleaggregator.net">PeopleAggregator</a> (here by &#8216;PA&#8217;). I&#8217;m not impressed. Though, as Steve Borsch points out &#8211; it is <a href="http://www.iconnectdots.com/ctd/2006/06/marc_canters_pe.html">awe-inspiring</a>. Everything and the kitchen sink is in there &#8211; blogs, people, groups, audio, video, photos, links, search engines, everything!</p>
<p>Like <a href="http://myspace.com">MySpace</a>, and <a href="http://friendster.com">Friendster</a> before it, I don&#8217;t know what to use it for. I already have a blog (several in fact &#8211; you&#8217;re reading one now). I&#8217;m already comfortable with the weblog tools I use. </p>
<p>Why would someone with an existing blog start another one at PeopleAggregator?</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t want people to know who they actually are. That&#8217;s why someone would set up multiple accounts on multiple weblog, er &#8216;social networking&#8217; sites with multiple &#8216;collections&#8217; of &#8216;friends&#8217;. So they can maintain separate identities. Defeating the need to easily migrate between sites that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/">Mike Arrington cites and a benefit to PA</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true because, I couldn&#8217;t point any of my existing blogs at PA, or point it to existing URLs of photos of me &#8211; it wanted me to upload the photo (though &#8216;enter a url&#8217; exists for Images). I had to got through the entire, annoying sign-up process, describing who I &#8220;am&#8221;&#8230;again. Why can&#8217;t I just point it to a URL that describes me (like <a href="http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/a-use-case-for-identity-xml-demographic-surveys/">I talk about on another blog</a>). This is actually an incentive to to lie about your identity &#8211; it&#8217;s sure a lot more fun than re-entered that same damn info.</p>
<p>Once inside, the interface as a whole is as clumbsy and heavy-handed as MySpace. People that grok that will probably have no problem with PA. Me, I&#8217;m baffled. Why can&#8217;t it look like WordPress?</p>
<p>In fact &#8211; the current PA interface looks like a made-for-TV version of <a href="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot.org</a> or MyYahoo circa 1997. Lots of collapsable sections all with very strong header bars and very techie-looking color scheme. Every single form field has a border around it &#8211; and there are piles of them on every screen. A setting for this, for that &#8211; and nothing with a smart default. Argh.</p>
<p>Oh, look &#8211; place holders for Google AdSense and other <a href="http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3616001">ad banners</a> and no RSS feeds. Hasn&#8217;t anyone at PeopleAggregator gotten the memo that the pageview model is dead?</p>
<p>Perhaps it could be useful as a download-able rather than hosted &#8216;social network&#8217;?<br />
That&#8217;s one of the great things about weblog tools, there&#8217;s one that&#8217;ll work on almost any server environment &#8211; PHP, Perl, Ruby, ASP, Java. If you&#8217;d rather not muck around with your own install &#8211; there&#8217;s hosted systems like <a href="http://blogger.com">Blogger</a>, <a href="http://typepad.com">TypePad</a>, and <a href="http://wordpress.com">WordPress.com</a>. If PA was written in something other than PHP &#8211; say with Marc Canter&#8217;s Macromedia history &#8211; ColdFusion. Then I could see a market for a downloadable PA. But, there&#8217;s <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a> &#8211; so um.</p>
<p>After poking around for a while, I found 2 big things PeopleAggregator left out:</p>
<ol>
<li>A reason to use it.</li>
<li>A &#8216;Delete Account&#8217; button.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mnteractive.com/archive/peopleaggregator-myspace-for-the-other-you/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

