iPod shuffle - Auto Half Full or Half Empty?

Everyone’s up in arms about Apples new iPod Shuffle, their sub-$100 USB Flash-based mp3 player. It’s been described as “flawed” and the lack of screen elicited responses like, “isn’t a mediocre screen better than none at all?”.

This is the classic glass half empty or half full problem. Either:

  1. the world sucks, everyone makes bad decisions and we’re all going to hell in a handcart or
  2. people are good, everything has positive points, and things are getting better.

Taking this from a ‘glass is half-full’ perspective, here’s the rational I would use to nix the screen:

  1. Only the songs you put on the shuffle will be on the shuffle, i.e. you’re familiar with all your songs.
  2. A very popular game show (Name That Tune) was developed based on our ability to identify songs by the first few notes.
  3. There’s a ‘next track’ button if you’re not happy with the one playing. (I’d even take this one step further and remove the ‘previous track’ button).
  4. It’s very difficult to be active (workout, run, change your car’s oil) and read the iPod’s screen (I’ve tried).
  5. A screen would send the price over $100.

From that perspective, the iPod shuffle is a brilliant product. A digital music player stripped down to it’s barest essentials; play, stop, next track, previous track, louder, quieter, iTunes integration.