<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separated at birth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/separated-at-birth/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/separated-at-birth</link>
	<description>Minnesota's Interaction Design, Information Architecture, and User Experience Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Thickins</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/separated-at-birth/comment-page-1#comment-3887</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Thickins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/separated-at-birth/#comment-3887</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s a riot, Darrel!  one would think Zune would&#039;ve come first, but I&#039;m not so sure...Zink&#039;s been in development a long time -- and knowing MS&#039; lame past in naming and branding, I would tend to side with Zink on this one

but who knows? goes to show, I guess, that there just aren&#039;t all that many original, new ideas when it comes to logos!

(btw, there&#039;s a connection of sorts to the Twin Cities relating to Zink....they&#039;re former Polaroid people, and that brand is now owned, of course, by The Petters Group...so I happen to know they maintain a relationship with Petters -- I met the Zink CEO at the recent DEMO conference where they had their coming-out party)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a riot, Darrel!  one would think Zune would&#8217;ve come first, but I&#8217;m not so sure&#8230;Zink&#8217;s been in development a long time &#8212; and knowing MS&#8217; lame past in naming and branding, I would tend to side with Zink on this one</p>
<p>but who knows? goes to show, I guess, that there just aren&#8217;t all that many original, new ideas when it comes to logos!</p>
<p>(btw, there&#8217;s a connection of sorts to the Twin Cities relating to Zink&#8230;.they&#8217;re former Polaroid people, and that brand is now owned, of course, by The Petters Group&#8230;so I happen to know they maintain a relationship with Petters &#8212; I met the Zink CEO at the recent DEMO conference where they had their coming-out party)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

