<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype, Remember The Milk, Interface Design That Makes You Smile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile</link>
	<description>Minnesota's Interaction Design, Information Architecture, and User Experience Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>Garrick- You can expect a call from Yahoo as soon as you label it Web 3.0. Unfortunately I&#039;ve already Panteted the system for combining ajax, DHTML, and Windex. You can start paying royalties whenever you&#039;d like. 

However the new Microsoft (Google) will sue me as they will have applied for the pantent after I have and win without prior art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garrick- You can expect a call from Yahoo as soon as you label it Web 3.0. Unfortunately I&#8217;ve already Panteted the system for combining ajax, DHTML, and Windex. You can start paying royalties whenever you&#8217;d like. </p>
<p>However the new Microsoft (Google) will sue me as they will have applied for the pantent after I have and win without prior art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrick Van Buren</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got AJAX, Mr. Clean, and some Windex in my kitchen - when can I expect the call from Yahoo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got AJAX, Mr. Clean, and some Windex in my kitchen &#8211; when can I expect the call from Yahoo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>Darrel,

I think there is a fine granularity of difference here.. not much, but worth a quick mention.

The difference is that search panes help ween the choices down.. you go from everything down to few*.. where as with form validation, you are going from ERROR/INVALID to &quot;Check&quot;

In other words, even though you expect:
1)to have many items to search through AND
2)an empty field is invalid/unacceptable

One activity is a &quot;hunt&quot; while the other is a boolean, ok or not ok.  I&#039;m not sure how most people come up with passwords, but this would only flow nicely if you had a single &quot;root&quot; password that you built on to make it more complex (or acceptable)

That said.. I do agree with your AJAX take :)

*assuming Firefox search is like Opera&#039;s quick find</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darrel,</p>
<p>I think there is a fine granularity of difference here.. not much, but worth a quick mention.</p>
<p>The difference is that search panes help ween the choices down.. you go from everything down to few*.. where as with form validation, you are going from ERROR/INVALID to &#8220;Check&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, even though you expect:<br />
1)to have many items to search through AND<br />
2)an empty field is invalid/unacceptable</p>
<p>One activity is a &#8220;hunt&#8221; while the other is a boolean, ok or not ok.  I&#8217;m not sure how most people come up with passwords, but this would only flow nicely if you had a single &#8220;root&#8221; password that you built on to make it more complex (or acceptable)</p>
<p>That said.. I do agree with your AJAX take <img src='http://mnteractive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>*assuming Firefox search is like Opera&#8217;s quick find</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>&quot;Error Messaging presenting itself before iâ€™ve finished typing my verification of password saying itâ€™s invalid seems awkward. &quot;

It is. At first. But once you get the hang of it (like Firefox&#039;s search pane) you realize how great it is.

But, remember, AJAX isn&#039;t about better interaction...it&#039;s about being Web 2.0 and getting bought by Yahoo or Google. ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Error Messaging presenting itself before iâ€™ve finished typing my verification of password saying itâ€™s invalid seems awkward. &#8221;</p>
<p>It is. At first. But once you get the hang of it (like Firefox&#8217;s search pane) you realize how great it is.</p>
<p>But, remember, AJAX isn&#8217;t about better interaction&#8230;it&#8217;s about being Web 2.0 and getting bought by Yahoo or Google. ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I felt the same way.  I half wondered if there should be a slight pause before it starts sending feedback... even a second delay would be better.

I&#039;m not sure the best way to do that though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I felt the same way.  I half wondered if there should be a slight pause before it starts sending feedback&#8230; even a second delay would be better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure the best way to do that though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed at the simplicity, while perplexed at some of the execution. Error Messaging presenting itself before i&#039;ve finished typing my verification of password saying it&#039;s invalid seems awkward. People expect systems to be &quot;intelligent&quot;, this could be confusing for lesser experienced users. 

Otherwise, I think uses of Ajax like this should be implimented more often. However, It will be a long time before major companies gain enough skills internally to impliment beautiful interaction like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed at the simplicity, while perplexed at some of the execution. Error Messaging presenting itself before i&#8217;ve finished typing my verification of password saying it&#8217;s invalid seems awkward. People expect systems to be &#8220;intelligent&#8221;, this could be confusing for lesser experienced users. </p>
<p>Otherwise, I think uses of Ajax like this should be implimented more often. However, It will be a long time before major companies gain enough skills internally to impliment beautiful interaction like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrick Van Buren</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eddie, I fixed the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eddie, I fixed the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/skype-remember-the-milk-interface-design-that-makes-you-smile/comment-page-1#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/?p=619#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>I signed up just to see the process.  I like the check that shows up as you type, very slick.

Also, you have the link to rememberthemilk.com wrong.  Google found it quick enough for me though :)

This reminds me of a &quot;task list&quot; pet peeve I have.. It would be nice if lists made an effort to understand priority levels.  You can change the importance priority- but it doesn&#039;t matter.  Or more to the point, there are reminders that are kind of pointless to be reminded of if you miss it.. &quot;Jessica Alba will be at the corner bar at 9:00 PM on Friday&quot; does no good once Saturday rolls around.  Why can&#039;t we set an appointment to disappear or &quot;go away&quot; once the time has passed?  I hate coming back from vacation and opening Outlook to find 32 messages of junk that I don&#039;t care about any more &quot;Reminder: Staff meeting! 2days overdue&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up just to see the process.  I like the check that shows up as you type, very slick.</p>
<p>Also, you have the link to rememberthemilk.com wrong.  Google found it quick enough for me though <img src='http://mnteractive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This reminds me of a &#8220;task list&#8221; pet peeve I have.. It would be nice if lists made an effort to understand priority levels.  You can change the importance priority- but it doesn&#8217;t matter.  Or more to the point, there are reminders that are kind of pointless to be reminded of if you miss it.. &#8220;Jessica Alba will be at the corner bar at 9:00 PM on Friday&#8221; does no good once Saturday rolls around.  Why can&#8217;t we set an appointment to disappear or &#8220;go away&#8221; once the time has passed?  I hate coming back from vacation and opening Outlook to find 32 messages of junk that I don&#8217;t care about any more &#8220;Reminder: Staff meeting! 2days overdue&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

