<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smack Down on Leopard&#8217;s Fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnteractive.com/archive/smack-down-on-leopards-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/smack-down-on-leopards-fonts</link>
	<description>Minnesota's Interaction Design, Information Architecture, and User Experience Design Community</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://mnteractive.com/archive/smack-down-on-leopards-fonts#comment-19863</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnteractive.com/archive/smack-down-on-leopards-fonts/#comment-19863</guid>
		<description>I'd pretty much call Papyrus condensed a bug. 

I agree, in terms of typography, MS has been shining in comparison to Apple's efforts of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d pretty much call Papyrus condensed a bug. </p>
<p>I agree, in terms of typography, MS has been shining in comparison to Apple&#8217;s efforts of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
